![]() A cartoon of a brown-skinned man with an Afro and wearing the tooth appeared on the package. In the novelties section, for example, the company was selling a gold tooth cap for people interested in dressing up as pimps. Other protestors noted that the company was still selling figurines that played on the same types of racial stereotypes. ![]() "This is not just a racial thing," said Barfield, a self-described community activist. "An apology is necessary for them to recognize that they have disgraced our community."ĭavid Barfield, who led protestors in chants of "Racism is not a game," said he was incredulous that anyone would want to make money selling an item that he felt was so obviously demeaning to people of color. "It was completely disgraceful and dehumanizing to our community," Dawson said. ![]() No one from Urban Outfitters was available for comment on when the game was pulled.īut Dawson and other protestors said the company still owed African Americans an apology. Protestors said they were unaware of the company's decision. A notice on Urban Outfitters' Web site said that the company had stopped selling the game "due to customer concerns." That strategy appeared to be successful: Employees at the company's Broadway Market store said it was no longer for sale. The game's creator has said he intentionally used racial stereotypes to create a parody of the classic Monopoly game.Ī little more than a week ago, the NAACP vowed to protest the retailer until the game was pulled from the shelves. The protest was organized in response to the sale of the board game, in which players compete to buy the most stolen property in an imaginary urban ghetto and amass the most money. "We're going to be here until the CEO of Urban Outfitters gives the NAACP and African Americans everywhere a letter stating that they were insensitive to put this game on the market for any length of time," said Eric Dawson, an activist with the Seattle branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. In May 2006, the court estimated that Chang generated US$8,790,000 in profits from the sale of Ghettopoly, and that damages of $400,000 were reasonable as reflected in the court documents.Outraged by a game that portrays African Americans as pimps and drug dealers, a group of about 40 people protested in front of two Urban Outfitters stores in Seattle yesterday in an effort to force an apology from the retailer for selling the game Ghettopoly. The court thus entered a "default judgment" for Hasbro's continued use of "Monopoly" as a trademark, and dismissed Chang's counterclaims, which were to revoke trademark status on Monopoly. In January 2006, Chang was found in contempt of court for failure to produce documents. In October 2003, Hasbro sued Chang over the game's similarities to Monopoly. Further such games were planned, including Hoodopoly, Hiphopopoly, and Thugopoly. Another Monopoly variant, Redneckopoly, is also available at. According to Chang's website, which still sells the game, it is also available on Amazon. Chang continued to market the game without their support. ![]() The game was pulled from the market by Urban Outfitters, just one of its many retailers. The game was criticized as offensively racist by a local chapter of the NAACP and by black clergy, as well as by Asian American groups, including the National Asian Pacific American Legal Consortium and Organization of Chinese Americans.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |